Dear Chris Iannicello
First, I should thank your invitation honestly and extend sincere apology for my tardy reply.
However, I cannot but express my deep worry: the thins we really need would not be consecutively supporting new researching results but making a serious and solemn reconsideration on los of unsolved problems and forming a united principle everybody can rationally accepted.
We should know: any discussion or study basing upon a wrong foundation would be insignificant except expending both human and material resources uselessly.
So, can not we make a logic arrangement upon the whole modern natural science system from its beginning?
Every honest researcher would not refuse such an obvious fact: from Newtonian mechanics to so-called quantity mechanics, and even the mathematics itself, there is full of contradiction. Just for it, many scientists may frankly call the natural science system as the set of common ideas a so-called scientific community. Consequently, the science as well as all discussions in the name of science would lose their own significance.
I am really not interested in these unbound and idle images, conjectures or judgments disregarding logic strictness. And I think the work we should conscientiously and earnestly do is such as:
Honestly facing with the criticism on Newtonian mechanics made by Leibniz and answering what the initial system really is?
Rethinking and solving the argument on the philosophy foundation of modern mathematic system;
Finishing the task of rationally rebuilding thermodynamics, supported by J. Serrin in the 1950’s;
Considering what turbulence is and rebuilding a logic consistent fluid dynamics;
Supplying the displacement current with proper material connotation, finding logic improprieties implied in Maxwell’s theory and rebuilding a properly posed mathematic physical model that can be used to solve a dynamic and varying electromagnetic field;
Answering what really is the object quantum mechanics studies, facing squarely forms of contradiction in the theory and rebuilding a consistent formal system in logic.
Everybody can believe that if these problems are really solved, other problems interesting to us would be solved naturally.
……
I cannot understand why we do not allow our predecessors, as such as Newton, Cauchy, Gauss, Clausius, Maxwell, to make some mistakes in there works? I cannot either understand why we allow ourselves to freely make inferences from some unreliable promises?
Thanks very much.

------------------    
杨本洛
2010-01-08
www.yangbenluo.com
www.yangbenluo.cn
www.mtn.com.cn
-------------------------------------------------------------
发件人：AIP UniPHY
发送日期：2010-01-07 22:28:46
收件人：Benluo Yang
抄送：
主题：AIP UniPHY: Register Today!

AIP|UniPHY - Scientific Social NetworkingDear Benluo Yang,
In November, we sent you an invitation to register for AIP UniPHY (aipuniphy.org), our new scientific professional
                social networking platform that is designed to enhance and accelerate the collaborative process among Physical Science researchers.
                Since then, AIP launched Version 2 of AIP UniPHY, which contains a new graphical interface and enhanced
                functionality such as a new CV section where you can display your professional profiles and research
                interests, the ability to recommend articles to other members, and a “People you might know” feature, which lists
                researchers that have collaborated with one’s co-authors.
                Sign up today and join over 10,000 users that have registered since launch. Experience for yourself how AIP UniPHY
                can be a valuable tool to assist with your research and collaborative efforts.
Our Publication Wizard will help you set up your scientific profile within minutes following your registration.  To get started click on the link below:Register for AIP UniPHY today!AIP UniPHY: Connect, Collaborate, Create
AIP UniPHY contains the research profiles of more than 275,000 physics researchers, representing over 2.4 million connections from over 1,000 institutions in nearly 80 countries. The profiles were generated from author and co-author information from 1.6 million publications published in 100 leading physics journals! AIP UniPHY is a FREE service that offers an innovative way for researchers to forge connections with colleagues worldwide.   Profile Page Network Visualization
We look forward to seeing you at www.aipuniphy.org. Please send any feedback to uniphyfeedback@aipuniphy.org
Sincerely, Chris Iannicello
                Product Manager, AIP UniPHY
                American Institute of Physics
                www.aipuniphy.org
                ciannice@aip.org
                516-576-2289
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please simply click on the following link: Remove my name.